Petrol odours and carb performance
Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 12:50 am
Do all our old cars smell of petrol inside when they are running? Or is it exclusively ALL the old cars I buy?
My twin-carb auto has always smelled of fuel. It is less bad now than it was, because of all the things it had wrong with it when I bought it. Originally it had a weeping fuel pump, damp float chamber gaskets, wasn't burning fuel properly because of the incorrect distributor advance curve, a blocked tail pipe, and my inability to set the carbs properly because of both of those two factors and more. Now it's got 'rebuilt' carburettors (more like exchanged), fuel-tight gaskets, new piping, the right advance curve, and a functional exhaust pipe. It still smells of petrol though inside the car when on choke and for a prolonged period during the warm-up. Once properly hot, as far as I can tell, the smell goes away (unlike on my fuel injected Escort where I'm now waiting for an opportunity to replace all the injector seals, even though there are no visible leaks on THAT!)
When I was a young driver I cannot remember ANY of the carburettored cars back then smelling of fuel. Cortina, Viva, Marina....BMWs, fwd VWs and the last carburettored car I owned as a 'modern' was a 1991 Toyota Corolla bought in 1995. Every single classic car I've bought since 2003 has either smelled of fuel or carbon monoxide, or both. Obviously fuel is the lesser of two evils there.
Also I want to ask, if anyone knows the answer, is it normal for a twin carb car to 'fluff' when revved unless fully warmed up? Because that is another thing my Marina has always done, both before and after the pre-purchase defects. When it's started on full choke, basically it revs cleanly. But whether being driven or being warmed at rest, as I push in the choke the initial response when pressing the accelerator is a sort of 'flat spot' band where it splutters and fluffs before clearing its throat and revving properly. I get this at every slow down and stop (if being driven) until the engine is properly hot and those carbs have warmed up too, when it seems to work perfectly fine. I'd say also that's when the fuel smells begin to disappear.
So like I say, it had this flat spot when it was running sick, and it's now supposedly running healthily, This twin-carb auto has always had this characteristic. Ac far as I'm concerned my old 1975 single carb 1.8 automatic Marina wasn't like it. The only other twin-carb cars I've owned had six cylinders, a 2.5 litre Triumph and a Jaguar 2.4. The Triumph smelled of petrol a bit but otherwise the engine was it's best asset. I could push the choke in really quickly on that car and it would run fine, and I've read similar accounts like that of driving Triumphs. The Jag was another story, but that was a nightmare for a number of reasons.
So if anyone can please educate me on how a twin-carb 1.8 is supposed to behave, whether in a Marina or an MGB, I'd appreciate it. And also if people live with an accept a bit of a petrol smell in 40-50 year old cars, or if, like I say, it's just the ones I buy.
Mick.
My twin-carb auto has always smelled of fuel. It is less bad now than it was, because of all the things it had wrong with it when I bought it. Originally it had a weeping fuel pump, damp float chamber gaskets, wasn't burning fuel properly because of the incorrect distributor advance curve, a blocked tail pipe, and my inability to set the carbs properly because of both of those two factors and more. Now it's got 'rebuilt' carburettors (more like exchanged), fuel-tight gaskets, new piping, the right advance curve, and a functional exhaust pipe. It still smells of petrol though inside the car when on choke and for a prolonged period during the warm-up. Once properly hot, as far as I can tell, the smell goes away (unlike on my fuel injected Escort where I'm now waiting for an opportunity to replace all the injector seals, even though there are no visible leaks on THAT!)
When I was a young driver I cannot remember ANY of the carburettored cars back then smelling of fuel. Cortina, Viva, Marina....BMWs, fwd VWs and the last carburettored car I owned as a 'modern' was a 1991 Toyota Corolla bought in 1995. Every single classic car I've bought since 2003 has either smelled of fuel or carbon monoxide, or both. Obviously fuel is the lesser of two evils there.
Also I want to ask, if anyone knows the answer, is it normal for a twin carb car to 'fluff' when revved unless fully warmed up? Because that is another thing my Marina has always done, both before and after the pre-purchase defects. When it's started on full choke, basically it revs cleanly. But whether being driven or being warmed at rest, as I push in the choke the initial response when pressing the accelerator is a sort of 'flat spot' band where it splutters and fluffs before clearing its throat and revving properly. I get this at every slow down and stop (if being driven) until the engine is properly hot and those carbs have warmed up too, when it seems to work perfectly fine. I'd say also that's when the fuel smells begin to disappear.
So like I say, it had this flat spot when it was running sick, and it's now supposedly running healthily, This twin-carb auto has always had this characteristic. Ac far as I'm concerned my old 1975 single carb 1.8 automatic Marina wasn't like it. The only other twin-carb cars I've owned had six cylinders, a 2.5 litre Triumph and a Jaguar 2.4. The Triumph smelled of petrol a bit but otherwise the engine was it's best asset. I could push the choke in really quickly on that car and it would run fine, and I've read similar accounts like that of driving Triumphs. The Jag was another story, but that was a nightmare for a number of reasons.
So if anyone can please educate me on how a twin-carb 1.8 is supposed to behave, whether in a Marina or an MGB, I'd appreciate it. And also if people live with an accept a bit of a petrol smell in 40-50 year old cars, or if, like I say, it's just the ones I buy.
Mick.