3.89 Diff

**Topics directly related to Marinas and Itals**

Moderators: ClaytonSpeed, balmy

david painter
Posts: 1725
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 3:52 pm

3.89 Diff

Post by david painter » Sun Feb 02, 2020 8:44 pm

Hi looking for a good 3.89:1 diff as fitted to the late Ital 1.3 or 1500 Dolomite
Thanks
Dave

User avatar
wfb
Posts: 300
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 8:55 pm
Location: Paisley

Re: 3.89 Diff

Post by wfb » Sun Feb 02, 2020 9:45 pm


david painter
Posts: 1725
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 3:52 pm

Re: 3.89 Diff

Post by david painter » Mon Feb 03, 2020 7:53 pm

Thank you for the link but as collection only a bit far away for me Hopefully I have a recon 3.89 one coming next week from a local Triumph Specialist he has agreed to take a 3.63 in exchange
Dave

User avatar
timspencer
Posts: 775
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2015 11:17 am

Re: 3.89 Diff

Post by timspencer » Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:02 pm

Would this make for higher gearing?

david painter
Posts: 1725
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 3:52 pm

Re: 3.89 Diff

Post by david painter » Tue Feb 04, 2020 7:27 pm

The lower the number the higher the ratio my car is currently running a 4.11 diff it is still a 1.3 at present so a 3.63 would be too high the ie at 3500rpm with the 195/55r15 tyres I run equates to
4.11 = 59.27mph
3.89= 62.62 mph
3.63= 67.10 mph
Short term I plan to do the Cowley Convoy. Long term I an going to fit a 2.0TC O series engine with a lt77 box I feel this will be best overall gearing mixed for running in the lanes and reasonable motorway cruising.
Dave

User avatar
timspencer
Posts: 775
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2015 11:17 am

Re: 3.89 Diff

Post by timspencer » Thu Feb 06, 2020 5:46 pm

I would like a higher ratio for my 1.7, which runs 165/70 R 13 tyres, at 70mph its doing 4000!

User avatar
MarinaCoupe
Posts: 10257
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: Bedford
Contact:

Re: 3.89 Diff

Post by MarinaCoupe » Thu Feb 06, 2020 6:23 pm

Tim you have a 3.63:1 rear axle in the 1700, the next one up is the 3.29:1 talk to David Balme about the performance. Good top speed and cruising but sluggish off the line with a standard engine its a 9.3% increase in gearing.

I would look at some wider tyres with the same ratio so 185/70 R13 - that would take 5% off the revs (200 rpm). But then you’ll need some wide wheels as wider tyres won’t fit on 4.5” rims - so maybe banded wheels with standard rims.

david painter
Posts: 1725
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 3:52 pm

Re: 3.89 Diff

Post by david painter » Thu Feb 06, 2020 7:54 pm

I would not be looking at a 3.29 diff as it will take far to much edge off the performance. My reasoning for going for the 3.89 is I intend to fit a LT77 gearbox with a 5th gear ratio of 0.83 gives the equivalent of 3.23 diff ratio so you get the best of both worlds
Dave

User avatar
timspencer
Posts: 775
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2015 11:17 am

Re: 3.89 Diff

Post by timspencer » Sat Feb 15, 2020 9:57 am

MarinaCoupe wrote: Thu Feb 06, 2020 6:23 pm Tim you have a 3.63:1 rear axle in the 1700, the next one up is the 3.29:1 talk to David Balme about the performance. Good top speed and cruising but sluggish off the line with a standard engine its a 9.3% increase in gearing.

I would look at some wider tyres with the same ratio so 185/70 R13 - that would take 5% off the revs (200 rpm). But then you’ll need some wide wheels as wider tyres won’t fit on 4.5” rims - so maybe banded wheels with standard rims.
Thanks Chris

I bought some TR7 wheels for that reason, which turned out to have a different location of the valve so couldn't fit my correct hubcaps, which is one of the things i like about the HL.

I will need to get my current ones banded slightly

Post Reply